QSFP28 DAC vs Optical Fiber — 100 GbE Comparison

For 100 GbE links, you have two primary options: QSFP28 DAC (Direct Attach Copper) or QSFP28 optical with fiber patch cables. Each is optimal for different scenarios.

Quick Verdict

DAC for in-rack and adjacent-rack links (up to 5m active, 3m passive). Optical for cross-room, cross-floor, or long distances (up to 10 km LR, 80 km ER).

Side-by-Side Spec Comparison

SpecQSFP28 DAC CableQSFP28 Optical Fiber
Reach1-7m (3m passive, 5m active)100m (SR) / 10km (LR) / 80km (ER)
Latency~50ns~5μs (SR/LR)
Power per End0.5W passive / 1.5W active3.5W SR / 4W LR
Cost per 100G port pair$50-300 (DAC)$300-1,500 (optic + fiber)
Cable FlexibilityFixed (cable + transceiver welded)Modular (swap optics)

Green-highlighted cells indicate the winner for that spec.

Frequently Asked Questions

When should I use DAC vs optical?

DAC for in-rack uplinks (ToR to leaf) where reach < 5m. Optical for any link over 5m, structured cabling deployments, or cross-room runs.

Are DAC cables cheaper?

Significantly — 100G DAC: $50-300. 100G optic + 5m fiber: $400-1,500. For short-reach in-row links, DAC saves 60-80% per port pair.

Our Recommendation

DAC for short-reach (under 7m) in-row interconnects. Optical for everything else.

Need help deciding?

Email sales@prodisknetwork.com with your specific requirements. Our team will match you to the right product based on your workload, budget, and existing infrastructure.

Part of

Enterprise Networking Hub

View all 128 pages →

Network switches, routers, firewalls, NICs, SFP and QSFP transceivers, DAC cables, wireless access points.